There is a saying: “If your neighbor’s house catches fire, its flames will reach you if you do not hasten to extinguish it.” This is exactly what is happening in the Persian Gulf. Everyone was aware of the plan of the Zionists to completely neutralize the Islamic Republic of Iran, yet all that was done was to incite against it and pour hundreds of billions of dollars into the coffers of the American administration.
The result: the region is ablaze from end to end. Maritime navigation is almost paralyzed, the skies are closed or burning with conflict, while the peoples of the Arab and Islamic world watch, and our governments search for a *passive neutrality.
So what have we gained from all this? More material and human losses, more hatred and resentment, and more division and fragmentation.
The position of the United Arab Emirates has not changed by even an inch; rather, its hostility toward Iran has increased, along with its rapprochement with the Zionists. And as a reminder: what was the outcome of the occupation of Iraq ? Internal strife and instability across the region—from Syria to southern Turkey—and to this day Iraq and Syria have not fully recovered.
Whoever has not yet understood that Washington is prepared to burn entire countries for the sake of the interests of the powerful within it is naïve; and whoever still believes in alliances with the forces of evil—from America to the Zionists—will have no one to blame but himself.
What is called solidarity with the brotherly states of the Gulf turns its back on the truth: the blame lies with the aggressor, not with the one who is attacked.
*In international relations, the term Passive Neutrality is used to describe a situation in which states attempt to avoid direct confrontation but lack the real tools to influence the course of a crisis. This often leads to a loss of the ability to shape the final outcomes of the conflict.
