Source<\/a><\/p>\n.<\/p>\n
By amputation.<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n
By June 2024, doctors in Gaza estimated 3,000 children had lost one or more limbs.<\/p>\n
By January 2025, UNICEF counted 4,000 child amputees. The WHO coordinator cautioned that some amputations were unnecessary \u2014 performed not because they were medically required but because hospitals lacked the equipment and expertise for more precise care, and because there was no time: the next wave of casualties was already arriving.<\/p>\n
Children losing legs, arms, hands, eyes \u2014 not because any weapon had to hit them, but because a blockade ensured the instruments needed to save them did not exist.<\/p>\n
By imprisonment and torture.<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n
Since 1967, more than 55,500 Palestinian children have been arrested by Israeli forces. Since October 7, 2023, more than 1,700 in the West Bank alone. As of December 2025, 351 children detained in Israeli prisons \u2014 180 of them, or 51 percent, held without charge, without trial, on the basis of secret evidence renewable indefinitely. Israel refused the International Committee of the Red Cross access to any Palestinian detainee since October 7, 2023. A 2023 Save the Children report found that 86 percent of detained Palestinian children were beaten; 69 percent strip-searched; 60 percent placed in solitary confinement; 68 percent denied medical care. Waleed Ahmed, 17 years old, died in an Israeli prison in March 2025. An Israeli judge concluded he had likely been starved to death. In prison. In 2025. In a state that calls itself a democracy.<\/p>\n
By psychological annihilation.<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n
By August 2024, an estimated 19,000 children had lost one or both parents. By early 2026, more than 58,000. Within displacement camps that had themselves been bombed repeatedly, 70 percent of children showed clinical signs of psychological distress: sleep disorders, dissociation, uncontrolled terror. The term used by aid workers \u2014 WCNSF, \u2018Wounded Child No Surviving Family\u2019 \u2014 entered the medical lexicon in November 2023. It describes a child who has been physically injured, has lost every member of their family, and now exists in a condition for which no humanitarian protocol was designed, because no one had imagined a war that produced this outcome at this scale.<\/p>\n
These are not the byproducts of war. They are its architecture.<\/p>\n
The Names That Judgment Demands<\/b><\/h2>\n
Statistics are the language of bureaucracies. Names are the language of justice. Here are some of the names.<\/p>\n
Jinan Iskafi.\u00a0<\/b>Four months old. Gaza. Died May 3, 2025, of marasmus caused by blockade-induced formula shortage. Medical records reviewed by Amnesty International.<\/p>\n
Abdelaziz.\u00a0<\/b>Born premature at Kamal Adwan Hospital, February 24, 2024. His mother had survived on legumes and canned food. He was placed on a hospital ventilator. The ventilator stopped when the hospital ran out of fuel. His father kept his death certificate. He died within hours of birth.<\/p>\n
Nour al-Huda.\u00a0<\/b>Eleven years old. Cystic fibrosis. Admitted to Kamal Adwan Hospital March 15, 2024, with malnutrition, dehydration, lung infection. Her mother told Human Rights Watch: \u2018I can see her chest bones sticking out.\u2019<\/p>\n
Laila Khatib.\u00a0<\/b>Two years old. Shot dead in the bedroom of her house in Jenin by Israeli sniper fire during Operation Iron Wall, January 25, 2025. She is the youngest named fatality in the UN Human Rights Office report of October 2025.<\/p>\n
Rida Ali Ahmed Bisharat.\u00a0<\/b>Eight years old. Hamza Ammar Ahmed Bisharat, ten years old. Brothers. Killed January 8, 2025, in their family courtyard in Tammun, Tubas, by an Israeli air-to-ground missile. They were unarmed. The Israeli military later admitted it had not verified who the victims were before firing.<\/p>\n
Waleed Ahmed.\u00a0<\/b>Seventeen years old. Died in Israeli detention, March 2025. An Israeli judge concluded he was likely starved to death.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Jawad Younes.\u00a0<\/b>Eleven years old, Saksakieh, south Lebanon. He had just walked his four-year-old brother Mehdi home from their football game because the little one was tired. He returned to the game. An Israeli strike hit his uncle\u2019s house. His mother said: \u2018My heart told me.\u2019 He was killed on March 27, 2026.<\/p>\n
Zeinab al-Jabali.\u00a0<\/b>Ten years old. Bekaa Valley, Lebanon. Killed March 5, 2026, while helping prepare iftar during Ramadan. In 1982, her father\u2019s brother\u2014also ten years old\u2014was killed by an Israeli missile in the same country.<\/p>\n
The schoolgirls of Minab.\u00a0<\/b>At least 165 people killed when an Israeli strike hit the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls\u2019 elementary school in Minab, Iran, on February 28, 2026. Most were children. Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi shared their photograph. The school\u2019s name means \u2018The Good Tree.\u2019<\/p>\n
The children of the al-Najjar family.\u00a0<\/b>Nine siblings killed in Khan Younis, May 2025. All under 12 years old. Pulled from the rubble of their home. One survived, with critical injuries.<\/p>\n
These are ten names from a register that contains more than twenty-one thousand. Each one had a name before they became a number. History demands we say their names. History also demands we name those responsible.<\/p>\n
The Geography of Impunity Expands: Lebanon, Iran<\/b><\/h2>\n
Gaza was the laboratory. Lebanon is the replication. Iran is the escalation. The doctrine moves across borders with the consistency of a policy, not the chaos of a war.<\/p>\n
In Lebanon, since March 2, 2026: 172 children killed, 600 children killed or injured, nearly 390,000 children displaced. Israeli forces have struck homes far from any front line, in religiously mixed neighborhoods considered safe, in apartment buildings with no military presence, without warning, in the early hours of the morning, during Ramadan, during iftar, while families ate together. When asked, the Israeli military did not deny that children were killed. It said it had targeted \u2018Hezbollah facilities.\u2019 It provided no evidence. It named no targets. It faces no consequences.<\/p>\n
In Iran, since February 28, 2026: at least 254 children confirmed killed in US-Israeli strikes, according to the human rights organization HRANA. Total civilian death toll in Iran: 1,701. An analysis by BBC Verify confirmed that US Precision Strike Missiles struck residential buildings and a sports hall in the town of Lamerd, killing 21 people including 4 children. At least 65 schools were hit across Iran. At least 14 medical centers. More than 5,500 residential units. An internal American military investigation into the Minab girls\u2019 school massacre acknowledged the strike resulted from \u2018outdated targeting data.\u2019 That is what the United States calls 165 dead schoolgirls: outdated targeting data.<\/p>\n
Netanyahu, as the Islamabad ceasefire with Iran held, announced publicly that Lebanon was \u2018not part of the ceasefire\u2019 and continued bombing it for a 45th consecutive day. He said this openly. Without shame. Because he has never been given a reason to feel shame.<\/p>\n
The pattern is not a coincidence. It is a doctrine: kill enough children, in enough countries, with enough consistency, that the world eventually accepts child-killing as a permanent feature of the Middle Eastern landscape \u2014 as natural as weather, as inevitable as geography. The babies of Gaza, the schoolgirls of Minab, the footballers of Saksakieh: all reduced to a category called \u2018the cost of regional security.\u2019<\/p>\n
Security for whom?<\/p>\n
Trump, America, and the Business of Killing Children<\/b><\/h2>\n
Donald Trump re-entered the White House in January 2025 with a promise to end wars. He ended none. He started one: the war on Iran, launched jointly with Israel on February 28, 2026, in which US Tomahawk missiles and Precision Strike Missiles struck Iranian cities, killing children in schools and civilians at Ramadan iftar gatherings. Trump called it an effort to \u2018induce regime change.\u2019 He called Iran\u2019s supreme leadership a regime that \u2018oppresses its people.\u2019 He said the Iranian people deserved freedom.<\/p>\n
The schoolgirls of Minab were Iranian people. They did not receive freedom. They received a US missile. One hundred and sixty-five of them.<\/p>\n
Trump sent $3.8 billion in annual military aid to Israel when he re-entered office. He accelerated weapons transfers paused by the Biden administration. He moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem. He recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. He endorsed the annexation of the West Bank. He vetoed UN Security Council ceasefire resolutions. He blocked ICC jurisdiction over Israeli officials. He called Benjamin Netanyahu \u2018the greatest leader in the history of Israel.\u2019 He attended no funeral of any Palestinian child.<\/p>\n
The United States has for three decades been the primary financial sponsor, the primary arms supplier, the primary diplomatic shield, and the primary propagandist of the Israeli state. Every bomb dropped on a Gazan school carries an American serial number. Every missile that struck a Lebanese apartment building was paid for by American taxpayers. Every veto that prevented a UN ceasefire resolution was cast by an American diplomat with full knowledge of what their veto permitted to continue. This is not allegation. This is accounting.<\/p>\n
99 American healthcare workers who had served in Gaza wrote to President Biden in October 2024 to state that, using standard food security metrics, at least 62,413 deaths in Gaza had resulted from starvation \u2014 most of them young children \u2014 and at least 5,000 from lack of access to care for chronic diseases. They wrote to the President of the United States. He did not respond by changing policy. He sent more weapons.<\/p>\n
America does not merely support Israel. America is Israel\u2019s operational partner in the killing of children. The distinction between the two governments, in the context of Palestinian child mortality, is a distinction without a difference.<\/p>\n
And Trump, who rode to power a second time on the promise of being the man who would speak truth no one else dared speak, who styled himself the enemy of the corrupt establishment, who claimed to represent forgotten working people against a global elite: this is the man who chose, as the crowning achievement of his Middle East policy, to bomb a girls\u2019 school in southern Iran and send more money to a government that starves babies in Gaza. The hypocrisy is not incidental. It is the product.<\/p>\n
Europe\u2019s Comfortable Cowardice<\/b><\/h2>\n
If America is the armed accomplice, Europe is the well-dressed bystander who watched the crime, checked that no one was looking, and went home to dinner.<\/p>\n
European governments have, since October 2023, issued statements of concern. They have expressed deep worry. They have called for humanitarian pauses. They have voted for non-binding UN resolutions. They have sent small amounts of aid that Israel has blocked at the border. They have attended conferences where they discussed the situation with grave faces and empty hands. And then they have continued to export weapons to Israel, renewed trade agreements, invited Israeli officials to their capitals, and allowed their populations to be told, by state-funded broadcasters, that what was happening in Gaza was a \u2018conflict between two sides.\u2019<\/p>\n
The United Kingdom sold \u00a369 million in arms to Israel in 2023. Germany continued weapons exports for months after October 7. France maintained diplomatic and commercial relations throughout. Italy wavered and continued. The Netherlands was legally ordered by its own courts to halt F-35 component exports to Israel \u2014 and found procedural means to delay compliance.<\/p>\n
The European Union speaks of its \u2018rules-based international order\u2019 with the fervor of a religion. The rules, it turns out, apply to Russia\u2019s invasion of Ukraine with exemplary swiftness and determination. They do not apply to the killing of 21,000 Palestinian children. The order, it turns out, is based on the preservation of Western strategic interests, not on the protection of Arab children\u2019s lives.<\/p>\n
This double standard is not a flaw in European foreign policy. It is its operating principle. Arab lives have always been valued differently in the calculus of European civilization. The children of Gaza are not sufficiently European for their deaths to constitute a crisis of conscience. They are sufficiently distant, sufficiently brown, sufficiently Muslim, sufficiently Palestinian, to be processed as a \u2018humanitarian situation requiring a political solution.\u2019 Their deaths are a situation. Israeli military needs are a commitment.<\/p>\n
What Europe has demonstrated, with crystalline clarity, over these thirty months, is that \u2018Never Again\u2019 \u2014 the foundational pledge of post-Holocaust European civilization \u2014 was always conditional. It meant: never again to us. It did not mean: never again to anyone. It certainly did not mean: never again, including when the state established in the name of Holocaust survivors is the one doing the killing.<\/p>\n
This is not a paradox. It is a policy. And every European foreign minister who has signed another statement of concern while approving another arms license bears personal moral and legal responsibility for what those arms have done to the children of Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran.<\/p>\n
The Ideology of the Killing<\/b><\/h2>\n
It would be comfortable to attribute this to individual actors \u2014 a Netanyahu, a Trump, a compliant European foreign minister. It would make the problem manageable: remove the individuals, change the policy. But the killing of Palestinian children is not a personal aberration. It is the product of a coherent ideological system, and that system must be named.<\/p>\n
Israeli settler-colonial ideology \u2014 in its current, maximalist, governing form \u2014 holds that the land between the river and the sea belongs exclusively to the Jewish people, that Palestinian presence on that land is a demographic and security problem to be managed, reduced, and ultimately eliminated, and that the deaths of Palestinian civilians are either justified as collateral damage in the pursuit of legitimate security goals, or dismissed as the responsibility of Hamas for \u2018using them as human shields.\u2019 This framing \u2014 every dead child is Hamas\u2019s fault \u2014 has been repeated with such consistency by Israeli officials, Israeli military spokespeople, and Western governments that it has acquired the status of received wisdom.<\/p>\n
Let us examine what it means. It means that when Israeli forces bomb a hospital, it is because Hamas was using it. When they bomb a school, it is because Hamas was hiding there. When they bomb a UN shelter, it is because Hamas tunneled beneath it. When they starve 2.3 million people, it is because Hamas is using food as a weapon. When they shoot a two-year-old in her bedroom in Jenin, it is because Hamas\u2019s presence in the West Bank requires a security response. The doctrine of Hamas-as-shield is infinitely elastic: it absorbs every atrocity, explains every massacre, justifies every blockade. It is the ideological perpetual motion machine of impunity.<\/p>\n
But there is a clause in international law \u2014 a principle so elementary it is taught in the first week of humanitarian law courses \u2014 that makes this entire construction irrelevant. It is the principle of proportionality. Even if a military target exists. Even if Hamas is present. Even if there is a legitimate military purpose. It is still illegal to cause civilian harm \u2014 including to children \u2014 that is disproportionate to the anticipated military gain. Killing 21,000 children to pursue Hamas is disproportionate by any conceivable metric. The ICJ said so in January 2024. The ICC prosecutor said so. Every major human rights organization said so. Israel continued. America vetoed. Europe expressed concern.<\/p>\n
And underneath the legal argument lies a moral one that requires no legal training to understand: these are children. They are not abstractions. They are not demographics. They are not security threats. They are Jawad who took his little brother home before his game. They are Zeinab who helped her mother prepare iftar. They are the girls of Minab whose school was called the Good Tree. They are Jinan who needed formula and got a blockade. They are Abdelaziz who needed a ventilator and got a fuel shortage.<\/p>\n
The ideology that makes their deaths acceptable \u2014 that manufactures the language to process their killing without grief, without rage, without accountability \u2014 is not unique to Israel. It is the ideology of all colonial powers throughout history: the idea that some people\u2019s children matter more than others. The British in Kenya. The French in Algeria. The Americans in Vietnam. The Belgians in the Congo. The children of the colonized have always been the ones who could be killed without consequence, mourned without international alarm, buried without anyone in the powerful world changing their policy in response.<\/p>\n
Gaza is not an exception. It is the latest iteration of the oldest crime. And we are all old enough to know it.<\/p>\n
The Silence That Kills<\/b><\/h2>\n
Alan Kurdi was a Syrian child. He drowned in the Mediterranean on September 2, 2015, along with his mother and brother. A Turkish photojournalist named Nil\u00fcfer Demir found his body face-down on the beach near Bodrum, in his red shirt and blue trousers and small sneakers, and she photographed him. The photograph went viral in hours. European leaders wept. Donations to refugee charities surged fifteenfold in twenty-four hours. The image appeared on every front page in the world.<\/p>\n
The world paused for one day.<\/p>\n
Then it continued.<\/p>\n
More than 21,000 Palestinian children have been killed since October 2023. Each one had a face, a name, a pair of sneakers. Their deaths have been photographed, documented, broadcast, live-streamed, published on every social media platform in the world. The images exist. The evidence is not missing. What is missing is the political will to act on what the images show.<\/p>\n
This gap \u2014 between witnessing and acting, between knowing and preventing, between seeing and stopping \u2014 is not ignorance. It is policy. The Western governments that have watched these images and continued arming Israel have made a choice. They have chosen that the strategic relationship with Israel \u2014 its intelligence sharing, its technological collaboration, its role as a military platform in the Middle East, its value as a domestic political asset in elections shaped by pro-Israel lobbying \u2014 is worth more than 21,000 Arab children\u2019s lives. They have made this calculation explicitly, repeatedly, and with full information.<\/p>\n
This is the silence that kills. Not the silence of not knowing. The silence of knowing and choosing to continue.<\/p>\n
The doctors who returned from Gaza and spoke to journalists. The UN officials who published reports and were ignored. The legal scholars who argued at The Hague and watched their rulings unenforced. The journalists \u2014 some of whom were killed by Israeli strikes while reporting \u2014 who produced images and testimony the world saw and the world\u2019s governments processed as politically inconvenient. The teachers, nurses, parents, and ordinary citizens across the Global South who watched and felt something that the West\u2019s comfortable populations have been carefully insulated from feeling: the visceral understanding that the international system does not protect them. That the rules are not for them. That their children can be killed and the world\u2019s powerful will call it complicated.<\/p>\n
The UN Secretary-General said in November 2023: \u2018Gaza is becoming a graveyard for children.\u2019 He said it in public, in front of cameras, to the Security Council. Three of its five permanent members continued to arm, shield, or silently enable the state doing the burying.<\/p>\n
What Is Next: The Expanding Theater of Child Killing<\/b><\/h2>\n
What is next? \u2014 is the most important question of this moment, and the most dangerous one to answer honestly.<\/p>\n
The answer, based on the established pattern, is: it continues. It expands. Gaza is the laboratory. Lebanon is the application. Iran is the escalation. The next theater is already visible.<\/p>\n
The West Bank, where annexation proceeds daily, where 224 Palestinian children have been killed since January 2023 \u2014 nearly half of all child killings recorded there since records began in 2005. Where a 20-fold increase in the use of airstrikes has occurred since October 2023, in a territory which, under international humanitarian law, is not an armed conflict zone. Where Israeli settlers, armed and protected by the state, attack Palestinian villages with the frequency and impunity of a colonial militia, because that is what they are.<\/p>\n
Syria, where Israeli strikes on civilian infrastructure have resumed. Yemen, where US-Israeli military operations have killed civilians alongside Houthi fighters. The expanding geography of a project that has never been about Hamas, never been about October 7, never been about security. It has always been about land, and about who is permitted to live on it, and about whose children are considered human enough to mourn.<\/p>\n
The lesson being taught right now to the governments of the Global South \u2014 to every country watching from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Arab world \u2014 is this: the international system will not protect you. The ICC will not prosecute the powerful. The UN Security Council will be vetoed. The ICJ will be ignored. The arms will keep flowing. The children will keep dying. The statements of concern will keep being issued. And nothing will change.<\/p>\n
This lesson, once learned, will not produce the stable, rules-based world order that Western governments claim to want. It will produce the opposite: a world in which every state that can acquire nuclear weapons will do so, because those are the only ones that cannot be bombed with impunity; a world in which international institutions are understood to be instruments of Western power and treated accordingly; a world in which the children killed in Gaza, Minab, Saksakieh, and the West Bank are remembered not as a tragedy but as a warning that was not heeded.<\/p>\n
What comes next, if nothing changes, is not peace. It is the proliferation of the logic of Gaza: that civilian lives are acceptable costs, that children can be killed if the killer is sufficiently powerful, that law is for the weak, and that the only protection that exists is the protection you build yourself, with weapons that no one can veto.<\/p>\n
This is where the silence leads. This is what the arms exports purchase. This is what the UN vetoes enable. Not security. Not stability. The systematic destruction of the idea that human life has equal value regardless of the nationality, religion, or geopolitical position of the body it inhabits.<\/p>\n
The Indictment<\/b><\/h2>\n
This is not the conclusion of an article. It is the opening of an indictment. History will complete it. But let the record begin here.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/natharatmouchrika.net\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d8c50d67a61e292ff354c382d8571c04-179x300.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"undefined\"](\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/b\/b6\/Samouni2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/gaza-bakery.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n