Further clarification about why I do not trust the Western reading of modern historical events :

The seeds of the Second World War were planted by the Allied powers through the unjust conditions imposed on Germany, and in these Hitler found the fertile ground to nourish the German national spirit and the necessity of taking revenge against the oppressive Allies. Through the writings of historians and historical documents, we have seen how the West insisted on absolving itself of the injustice inflicted on defeated Germany when it carved away its territories and stripped it of the foundations of economic and military power. It was therefore natural for Hitler to resent such unfair treatment and to prepare for confronting the Allies once again.

The Allied narrative insists on its own righteousness and accuses Germany of aggressiveness, while forgetting its own colonial history and how, in both World War I and II, it occupied countries and maintained colonial domination over most of its territories outside Europe and the Americas.

Let us draw closer to the modern era and recall Bush’s narrative in the invasion of Iraq: the official American reading claimed the attack was justified under the pretext of “liberating Iraq,” while what we witnessed for more than two decades was that Iraq turned into a hotbed of criminal chaos that produced ISIS and sectarian warfare. So what “liberation” are the Americans talking about?

I return to say: the Western reading of the Nazi era deliberately conceals the evils of the Jewish lobby in Germany and depicts the matter as if Hitler had lost his mind and poured his rage and anger upon the Jews. They even portray it as though President Roosevelt, out of sheer ignorance, accused Hitler of occupying Palestine. This is pure falsehood. Hitler replied to him as follows: “It is not I who occupy Palestine; it is your allies, the English, who occupy Palestine and who hold its people in an iron grip.”

How can an American president be so ignorant of the realities on the ground and of the very recent history? And then American administrations after him come to lecture us about the rights of “God’s chosen people” in Palestine?

Does what Alois Brunner — one of the Gestapo men who died in Syria — said contradict the miserable truth about the Jews? When he was asked: “Are you remorseful for what you did to the Jews?” he replied: “No, I am not remorseful. Look at their actions in Jerusalem.”“Of course, this is Alois Brunner’s personal opinion.”

I return again to say: we must beware of the Western reading and of the standards of an international community that do not agree with the standards of our noble religion. The international community did not remain silent about the called Holocaust, yet it remained completely silent about the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing that Palestine has witnessed since the First World War.